The Key to Safeguard Your Credit: A Consumer Survey and Report on Identity Theft and the Security Freeze
07/19/2005
Executive Summary
Identity theft is one of
the fastest growing crimes in America. Identity theft is the taking of another's
personal information-such as social security number, name or date of birth-for
the purpose of assuming the victim's identity to commit fraud. The Federal Trade
Commission estimates that identity theft claims nearly 10 million victims annually,
costing businesses and consumers $53 billion.
Locally, an increasing number
of Massachusetts consumers are also falling victim to identity theft. During
the past five years, the number of Massachusetts consumers who have filed identity
theft complaints with the Federal Trade Commission has increased by almost 800
percent.
A June 2005 survey of over
500 Massachusetts shoppers conducted by MASSPIRG found that 14 percent were
victims of identity theft and 71 percent were concerned about becoming victims.
Consumers have great cause
for concern. Since the beginning of 2005, nearly 50 million consumers have had
their personal data compromised by several major security breaches involving
national companies like ChoicePoint, MasterCard, Citibank, and Bank of America.
These ongoing security breach
scandals demonstrate that individual consumers alone cannot fully protect themselves
from this crime. Easy access to consumers' confidential identifying information,
including social security numbers, has contributed to the identity theft epidemic.
Credit card companies, merchants, credit bureaus, and other businesses do not
adequately safeguard consumers' personal financial information, making it relatively
easy for thieves to steal this data and use it to take out new credit or to
rack up charges on existing accounts.
To guard against this harm,
ten states have passed "security freeze" laws that give their residents the
right to "lock" their credit files so that new credit accounts could not be
opened without their express approval. These laws help prevent identity theft
because most businesses will not issue new credit or loans to an individual
without first reviewing his or her credit report or credit score. If a consumer's
credit file is frozen and an imposter applies for credit in that consumer's
name, a prospective creditor would likely deny the imposter's application because
the security freeze would prevent the creditor from checking the consumer credit
report or score.
The Massachusetts legislature
is considering enacting a similar measure. To gauge consumers' support for legislation
enabling individuals to place a security freeze on credit reports, MASSPIRG
surveyed 500 shoppers during the month of June 2005. The results of the survey
demonstrate overwhelming support by the public for a security freeze law. Specifically:
- 93 percent of respondents
support the security freeze law.
- Of those that supported
the security freeze law, 89 percent of respondents would still support the law
even if it would take up to 48 hours to lift the freeze and get credit approval.
- 86 percent of respondents
said they would use a security freeze to restrict access to their credit report
if they had the option.
|