Campaign for Safe Energy

IT’S TIME WE RETIRE PILGRIM—After 40 years of operation, Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station’s license is scheduled to close down in 2017. MASSPIRG is working to ensure that Pilgrim, one of the most dangerous nuclear power plants in the coutnry, retires as soon as possible.

IT’S TIME TO CLOSE DOWN PILGRIM

MASSPIRG has worked for decades to close Pilgrim down, and we celebrated the announcment in September 2015 that its official shut down has been scheduled for 2017. However, Pilgrim is one of the most dangerous in nuclear power plants in the country, which is saying something given how dangerous nuclear power is, and 2017 is not good enough. As long a Pilgrim is open, Bay Staters on the Cape, South Shore, and Metro Boston remain at risk:

• Pilgrim’s 40-year-old General Electric Mark I reactor is the same weak and outdated design as some of those that failed in Fukushima.

• A recent Nuclear Regulatory Commission report found that Pilgrim is the second-most at-risk nuclear plant in the country from a potentially catastrophic earthquake.

• There are more than 1.2 million pounds of radioactive waste currently stored on site — if a fire were to occur in one of the storage pools, thousands could die as a result.

• In the case of a major catastrophe, evacuation plans aren’t sufficient — families on the Cape would have to drive toward Pilgrim to get out of harm’s way, and the millions in the metro-Boston area would quickly become stuck in gridlock.

 

NUCLEAR POWER IS INHERENTLY UNSAFE

While we look forward to the end of Pilgrim, we continue our 40 year fight against all nuclear power. It's inherently dangerous, potentially catastrophic and a terrible investment for our country. 

More than 70% of Bay Staters live within the 50-mile evacuation zone of a nuclear power plant — that’s more than 4.6 million men, women and children who are one unlikely series of mishaps away from potential disaster.

There is no known safe level of exposure to radiation, and mortality rates from more than mild exposure is extremely high. The levels of radiation that could escape from our reactors in the event of an accident or natural disaster could dramatically harm human health.

Issue updates

News Release | MASSPIRG | Safe Energy

Nuclear Power Plants Threaten Drinking Water for 4 Million Bay Staters

The drinking water for 4.8 million people in Massachusetts could be at risk of radioactive contamination from a leak or accident at nuclear power plants in the region, says a new report released today by the MASSPIRG Education Fund and Environment Massachusetts Research and Policy Center.

> Keep Reading
News Release | MASSPIRG | Safe Energy

Earthquake Near Virginia Nuclear Reactors Are a Reminder of the Risks

Yesterday’s earthquake in Virginia, less than ten miles from two nuclear reactors, is a jolting reminder of exactly the type of unpredictable risk that threaten the safety and security of nuclear power plants across the country.

> Keep Reading
Report | MASSPIRG Education Fund | Safe Energy

Unacceptable Risk

American nuclear power plants are not immune to the types of natural disasters, mechanical failures, human errors, and losses of critical electric power supplies that have characterized major nuclear accidents such as the one at Fukushima Daiichi power plant in Japan. Indeed, at several points over the last 20 years, American nuclear power plants have experienced “close calls” that could have led to damage to the reactor core and the subsequent release of large amounts of radiation.

> Keep Reading
News Release | MASSPIRG | Safe Energy

Nuclear Power: Not Worth the Risk

A new report released today by the Massachusetts Public Interest Research Group (MASSPIRG) documents a history of safety problems at nuclear reactors in the United States. These incidents – like the crisis at the Fukushima Daiichi power plant in Japan – illustrate that nuclear power carries with it risks that are simply not worth taking.

> Keep Reading

Pages

2006 Congressional Score Card

The 2006 Scorecard looks at the most important public interest votes taken between February 9, 2005 and February 1, 2006 in the U.S. Congress. These votes determined the direction of federal policy on critical issues ranging from environmental preservation to health care to consumer protections.

> Keep Reading

Pages

View AllRSS Feed

Consumer Alerts

Join our network and stay up to date on our campaigns, get important consumer updates and take action on critical issues.
Optional Member Code

Support Us

Your donation supports MASSPIRG's work to stand up for consumers on the issues that matter, especially when powerful interests are blocking progress.